# Omoide vs PeerTube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Omoide | PeerTube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 40/100 | 75/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #37 of 41 in Photo Management | #1 of 3 in Video Hosting |
| GitHub stars | 277 | 15 375 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +45 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 13 |
| Latest release | v0.7.6 · 21 Oct 2026 | v8.3.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

PeerTube scores 75/100 against 40/100 for Omoide, so it is the safer default.

Omoide ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for PeerTube.

If you want the quickest setup, Omoide is easier to run; PeerTube needs more configuration.

PeerTube is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Omoide](https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omoide.md)
- [PeerTube](https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/peertube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omoide-vs-peertube