# OmniVoice-Studio vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 92 652 ✓ | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 711 ✓ | +244 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 31 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 80/100 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 31 for Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP).

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap