# OmniVoice-Studio vs Wastebin

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | Wastebin |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 ✓ | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 808 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Wastebin.

If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 808 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [Wastebin](https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wastebin.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-wastebin