# OmniVoice-Studio vs uncompressed

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | uncompressed |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #71 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 93 286 ✓ | 213 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 012 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.0.0 · 4 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 47/100 for uncompressed, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for uncompressed.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; uncompressed needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [uncompressed](https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uncompressed.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-uncompressed