# OmniVoice-Studio vs trigger

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #7 of 32 in Workflow Automation |
| GitHub stars | 92 336 ✓ | 16 641 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 395 ✓ | +254 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 49 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.8.1 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 76/100 for trigger, so it is the safer default.

trigger ships more often: 49 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; trigger needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [trigger](https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trigger.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-trigger