# OmniVoice-Studio vs textsnap

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | textsnap |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #8 of 12 in Document Processing |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 ✓ | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 141 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.4.0 · 29 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 45/100 for textsnap, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for textsnap.

If you want the quickest setup, textsnap is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [textsnap](https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/textsnap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-textsnap