OmniVoice-Studiovssubarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | subarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #79 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 93 418 | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 144 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.7.24 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 48/100 for subarr, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for subarr.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; subarr needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 144 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →subarr details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep subarr, compare it with