# OmniVoice-Studio vs SonarQube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 10 in Code Review |
| GitHub stars | 93 190 ✓ | 11 122 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 916 ✓ | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 12 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 26.10.0.133078 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 71/100 for SonarQube, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for SonarQube.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; SonarQube needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [SonarQube](https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sonarqube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-sonarqube