# OmniVoice-Studio vs Single Server

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | Single Server |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #8 of 11 in Deployment |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 ✓ | 231 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 808 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.2.0 · 21 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 44/100 for Single Server, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Single Server.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 808 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [Single Server](https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/singleserver.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-singleserver