# OmniVoice-Studio vs ScreenTinker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | ScreenTinker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 93 190 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 916 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ScreenTinker.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-screentinker