# OmniVoice-Studio vs scanopy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | scanopy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 ✓ | 5 915 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 808 ✓ | +116 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 41 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.19.4 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 64/100 for scanopy, so it is the safer default.

scanopy ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 808 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [scanopy](https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/scanopy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-scanopy