# OmniVoice-Studio vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 93 560 ✓ | 35 524 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 286 ✓ | +1 692 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 286 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-rustfs