# OmniVoice-Studio vs rudderstack

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | rudderstack |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 3 in Customer Data Platform |
| GitHub stars | 92 870 ✓ | 4 508 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 929 ✓ | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 39 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v1.92.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 63/100 for rudderstack, so it is the safer default.

rudderstack ships more often: 39 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; rudderstack needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 929 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [rudderstack](https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rudderstack.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-rudderstack