# OmniVoice-Studio vs rss-to-activitypub

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | rss-to-activitypub |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #52 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 93 681 ✓ | 582 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 407 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 44/100 for rss-to-activitypub, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for rss-to-activitypub.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; rss-to-activitypub needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 407 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [rss-to-activitypub](https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-to-activitypub) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rss-to-activitypub.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-rss-to-activitypub