# OmniVoice-Studio vs R2R

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | R2R |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #6 of 7 in RAG |
| GitHub stars | 93 286 ✓ | 8 048 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 012 ✓ | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 59/100 for R2R, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for R2R.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [R2R](https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/r2r.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-r2r