# OmniVoice-Studio vs qm-music

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | qm-music |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 93 190 ✓ | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 916 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.

If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 916 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [qm-music](https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qm-music.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-qm-music