# OmniVoice-Studio vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 92 652 ✓ | 6 970 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 711 ✓ | +229 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 711 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-pulse