# OmniVoice-Studio vs Project OSRM

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | Project OSRM |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 92 336 ✓ | 8 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 395 ✓ | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 16 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [Project OSRM](https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/project-osrm.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-project-osrm