OmniVoice-StudiovsProject OSRM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | Project OSRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #2 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 92 336 | 8 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +57 395 | +75 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 16 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Python | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 69/100 for Project OSRM, so it is the safer default.
OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 16 for Project OSRM.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Project OSRM needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+57 395 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →Project OSRM details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep Project OSRM, compare it with