# OmniVoice-Studio vs PostHog

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | PostHog |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 92 975 ✓ | 40 497 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 034 ✓ | +588 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 3503 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3893.0 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 81/100 for PostHog, so it is the safer default.

PostHog ships more often: 3503 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [PostHog](https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/posthog.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-posthog