OmniVoice-StudiovsPostHog
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniVoice-Studio | PostHog | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 27 in Analytics |
| GitHub stars | 92 975 | 40 497 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 034 | +588 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 | 3503 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | agent-skills-v0.3893.0 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 81/100 for PostHog, so it is the safer default.
PostHog ships more often: 3503 stable releases in the past year, against 35 for OmniVoice-Studio.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; PostHog needs more configuration.
OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 034 stars in 30 days).
OmniVoice-Studio details →PostHog details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniVoice-Studio, compare it with
Keep PostHog, compare it with