# OmniVoice-Studio vs polar

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | polar |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 13 in Billing |
| GitHub stars | 93 681 ✓ | 10 436 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 407 ✓ | +157 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | @polar-sh/cli@3.0.0 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 71/100 for polar, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for polar.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; polar needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 407 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [polar](https://selfhost.directory/project/polar) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/polar.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-polar