# OmniVoice-Studio vs piclaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | piclaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #26 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 ✓ | 885 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 141 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 27 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.3.4 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 53/100 for piclaw, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 27 for piclaw.

If you want the quickest setup, piclaw is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [piclaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/piclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-piclaw