# OmniVoice-Studio vs pellicola

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | pellicola |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #16 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 93 286 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 012 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 45/100 for pellicola, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for pellicola.

If you want the quickest setup, pellicola is easier to run; OmniVoice-Studio needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 012 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [pellicola](https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pellicola.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-pellicola