# OmniVoice-Studio vs ibl.ai/os

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | ibl.ai/os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #65 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 ✓ | 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 141 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v0.182.2 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 55/100 for ibl.ai/os, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for ibl.ai/os.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; ibl.ai/os needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [ibl.ai/os](https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/os-2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-os-2