# OmniVoice-Studio vs Opengeni

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | Opengeni |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 93 082 ✓ | 212 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 141 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 20 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | opengeni-artifact-runtime-83ed5c0972719f6ed284b5b6940db5b3f7dfc093 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 50/100 for Opengeni, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 20 for Opengeni.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; Opengeni needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 141 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [Opengeni](https://selfhost.directory/project/opengeni) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/opengeni.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-opengeni