# OmniVoice-Studio vs OpenEMR

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniVoice-Studio | OpenEMR |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 94/100 ✓ | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 5 in Healthcare |
| GitHub stars | 93 418 ✓ | 5 555 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +58 144 ✓ | +87 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 35 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.5.7 · 26 Oct 2026 | v8_5_0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniVoice-Studio scores 94/100 against 72/100 for OpenEMR, so it is the safer default.

OmniVoice-Studio ships more often: 35 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for OpenEMR.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniVoice-Studio is easier to run; OpenEMR needs more configuration.

OmniVoice-Studio is growing faster right now (+58 144 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniVoice-Studio](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnivoice-studio.md)
- [OpenEMR](https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openemr.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnivoice-studio-vs-openemr