OmniToolsvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 10 511 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +264 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 72/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
OmniTools ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+264 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →Zammad details →