OmniToolsvswyoming-openwakeword
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | wyoming-openwakeword | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 10 492 | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +249 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 71/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; wyoming-openwakeword needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+249 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →wyoming-openwakeword details →