# OmniTools vs WhisperLive---CPU

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniTools | WhisperLive---CPU |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 10 491 ✓ | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 ✓ | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 71/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.

WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)
- [WhisperLive---CPU](https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/whisperlive-cpu.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnitools-vs-whisperlive-cpu