OmniToolsvsWhisperLive---CPU
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | WhisperLive---CPU | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 6 in Transcription |
| GitHub stars | 10 491 | 4 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +248 | +46 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 71/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; WhisperLive---CPU needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+248 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →WhisperLive---CPU details →