# OmniTools vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniTools | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 10 505 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +258 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 72/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

OmniTools ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+258 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnitools-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api