OmniToolsvssupabase-automated-self-host
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | supabase-automated-self-host | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools | #13 of 15 in Backend as a Service |
| GitHub stars | 10 496 | 506 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +249 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 72/100 against 48/100 for supabase-automated-self-host, so it is the safer default.
OmniTools ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for supabase-automated-self-host.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; supabase-automated-self-host needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+249 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →supabase-automated-self-host details →