# OmniTools vs ScreenTinker

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniTools | ScreenTinker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 10 517 ✓ | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +270 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 72/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.

ScreenTinker ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; ScreenTinker needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+270 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)
- [ScreenTinker](https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/screentinker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnitools-vs-screentinker