# OmniTools vs sandboxed.sh

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniTools | sandboxed.sh |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools | #97 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 10 511 ✓ | 676 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +264 ✓ | +4 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | android-v1.21.1 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 72/100 against 50/100 for sandboxed.sh, so it is the safer default.

sandboxed.sh ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; sandboxed.sh needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+264 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)
- [sandboxed.sh](https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/sandboxedsh.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnitools-vs-sandboxedsh