# OmniTools vs rebacklogs

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniTools | rebacklogs |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 ✓ | 43/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools | #36 of 45 in Project Management |
| GitHub stars | 10 490 ✓ | 184 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +247 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.3.3 · 6 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 71/100 against 43/100 for rebacklogs, so it is the safer default.

rebacklogs ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; rebacklogs needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+247 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)
- [rebacklogs](https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rebacklogs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnitools-vs-rebacklogs