# OmniTools vs quackback

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniTools | quackback |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 ✓ | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools | #9 of 14 in Customer Support |
| GitHub stars | 10 515 ✓ | 331 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +268 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 15 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.14.1 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniTools scores 72/100 against 50/100 for quackback, so it is the safer default.

quackback ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; quackback needs more configuration.

OmniTools is growing faster right now (+268 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniTools](https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omnitools.md)
- [quackback](https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/quackback.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omnitools-vs-quackback