OmniToolsvsQFieldCloud
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | QFieldCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 166 in Developer Tools | #4 of 9 in Mapping & GPS |
| GitHub stars | 10 511 | 246 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +264 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v26.29 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniTools scores 72/100 against 54/100 for QFieldCloud, so it is the safer default.
QFieldCloud ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; QFieldCloud needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+264 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →QFieldCloud details →