OmniToolsvsPulumi
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniTools | Pulumi | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #15 of 166 in Developer Tools | #1 of 3 in Infrastructure |
| GitHub stars | 10 487 | 25 829 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +244 | +30 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 |
| Latest release | v0.7.0 · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.272.0 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Pulumi scores 78/100 against 71/100 for OmniTools, so it is the safer default.
Pulumi ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for OmniTools.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniTools is easier to run; Pulumi needs more configuration.
OmniTools is growing faster right now (+244 stars in 30 days).
OmniTools details →Pulumi details →