OmniRoutevsZot Registry
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | Zot Registry | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #3 of 12 in Container Registry |
| GitHub stars | 82 107 | 2 919 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 091 | +120 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 12 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.1.22 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 64/100 for Zot Registry, so it is the safer default.
Zot Registry ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Zot Registry needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 091 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →Zot Registry details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep Zot Registry, compare it with