OmniRoutevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 82 382 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 366 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 366 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with