# OmniRoute vs World Monitor

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniRoute | World Monitor |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 82 151 | 89 717 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 135 ✓ | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 17 ✓ |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 86/100 for World Monitor, so it is the safer default.

World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.

## Details

- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)
- [World Monitor](https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/world-monitor.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omniroute-vs-world-monitor