# OmniRoute vs Workout.cool

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniRoute | Workout.cool |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 82 065 ✓ | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 049 ✓ | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 1 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.

OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 049 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)
- [Workout.cool](https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/workout-cool.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omniroute-vs-workout-cool