# OmniRoute vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniRoute | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 82 326 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 310 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 310 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omniroute-vs-wildbox