# OmniRoute vs Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniRoute | Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 33/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #46 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 82 304 ✓ | 144 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 288 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 33/100 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana, so it is the safer default.

OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 288 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)
- [Speedtest-for-InfluxDB-and-Grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omniroute-vs-speedtest-for-influxdb-and-grafana