OmniRoutevsShellHub
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | ShellHub | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #12 of 23 in Remote Access |
| GitHub stars | 82 242 | 2 243 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 226 | +175 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v0.28.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 64/100 for ShellHub, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ShellHub.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; ShellHub needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 226 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →ShellHub details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep ShellHub, compare it with