OmniRoutevssearcharr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | searcharr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 124 in AI | #51 of 110 in Chat |
| GitHub stars | 82 446 | 304 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 430 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 1 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v3.4.0 · 8 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 49/100 for searcharr, so it is the safer default.
OmniRoute ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for searcharr.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; searcharr needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 430 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →searcharr details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep searcharr, compare it with