# OmniRoute vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | OmniRoute | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 ✓ | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 82 326 ✓ | 45 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 310 ✓ | +1 622 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 87/100 for Reactive Resume, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.

If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.

OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 310 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [OmniRoute](https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/omniroute.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/omniroute-vs-reactive-resume