OmniRoutevsReactive Resume
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | Reactive Resume | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 82 326 | 45 023 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 310 | +1 622 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 34 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 87/100 for Reactive Resume, so it is the safer default.
Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OmniRoute.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Reactive Resume needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 310 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →Reactive Resume details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep Reactive Resume, compare it with