OmniRoutevsPrysm
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| OmniRoute | Prysm | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 88/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 125 in AI | #2 of 18 in Blockchain |
| GitHub stars | 82 264 | 3 790 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +3 248 | +8 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 10 |
| Latest release | radar-export-latest · 20 Oct 2026 | v7.3.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
OmniRoute scores 88/100 against 65/100 for Prysm, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, OmniRoute is easier to run; Prysm needs more configuration.
OmniRoute is growing faster right now (+3 248 stars in 30 days).
OmniRoute details →Prysm details →
Swap a project
Keep OmniRoute, compare it with
Keep Prysm, compare it with